https://ploum.nl/uploads/Artikelen_en_Track_Records_en_expertise/Intellectueel_eigendom/clothing-3987617_1920.jpg

Court of Justice of the European Union renders judgment in ZARA case regarding gift cards

15 Feb '24

Author(s): Paul Trapman

In this case between Buongiorno and Inditex, brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”), the dispute concerned a promotional campaign by Buongiorno. Buongiorno, a provider of information services via the internet and mobile telephone network, organized a campaign to promote a new type of subscription. As part of this campaign, new subscribers could participate in a lottery to win a ZARA gift card worth 1,000 euros. After clicking on a banner to access the prize draw, on the next screen the subscriber was shown the ‘ZARA’ sign in a rectangle, reminiscent of the design of gift cards.

This led to a legal dispute with Inditex, the owner of the ZARA brand, due to the use of the "ZARA" sign in the advertising campaigns. Inditex claimed that this use was unlawful and infringed its trademark rights. Buongiorno argued that it was only incidental use and that this sign was not used as a trademark, but rather as a referential use that falls under the lawful use of another's distinctive signs.

The CJEU reiterates that the proprietor of a trademark should not be entitled to prevent the general fair and honest use of the mark for identifying or referring to the goods or services as those of the proprietor. However, it is up to the national court to determine whether this specific use was necessary to indicate the intended purpose of a service which Buongiorno offered and, as appropriate, whether that use was made in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. However, before making such assessment, the national court should determine whether this specific use of the trademark constitutes use of a trademark at all.

Interesting questions remain, not only in relation to the assessment that the national court will have to make regarding the necessary use (was it also necessary to draw a rectangle creating the impression of a gift card), but also such as whether the gift card should be regarded as an exhausted good instead of as referential use.

Contact

Attorney at law, Partner

Willem Leppink

Expertises:  Intellectual property rights, European Law, Trademark and Design registration, Marketing and Advertising, Technology, Media and Telecom, Food, E-commerce,

Attorney at law

Paul Trapman

Expertises:  Intellectual property rights, Privacy law, Technology, Media and Telecom,

Share this article

Stay up to date

Click on the plus and sign up for updates on this topic.